As a guy, I had no prior knowledge of his work before my fiance introduced me to it–and now I see it everywhere. I will never buy her any–ever. It’s mainstream and thus, not special. Fortunately, she recognizes this too, and will never ask for any.
There’s no jealousy in that comment. It’s a statement of fact. They are not that “fratty.” Well dressed–yes. Educated–yes. None of those qualities are exclusive of those who are “fratty.”
I am a guy–though I suppose I have been referred to as a “slampiece” by a sorostitute at some point in my life.
I just don’t see the point of a promise ring. As I understand it, the promise is that one day in the future he will fully commit. If so, that is not a true committment. The same can be said for Letters.
They aren’t lame by themselves necessarily–well, a promise ring is kinda–but they are lame when equated to the same level of committment that comes with an engagement ring.
Being that I am engaged, I completely understand the level of committment that comes with it and EVERYTHING prior to that is merely a partial committment.
This isn’t to say that he doesn’t see future potential in the relationship that could lead to a proposal–but if he were so sure, and so truly committed, a proposal is what you would get…not letters…not a promise ring.
No, engagement rings are, in fact, a form of “true commitment.” Everything before that is semi-commitment and SHOULD NOT be confused with true commitment.
Let’s be reasonable, is it not ridiculous to say that letters or a promise ring is at all similar to the commitment that is TRULY made when a man asks a woman to marry him. And if you say it isn’t unreasonable–then how many levels of true commitment can there be?
The site is called TotalFratMove…therefore anything that takes place within the confines of said site is open to me. It is not, however, a two-way street. Know your place woman.
“It shows true commitment.” Like a promise ring. Lame.
Get a life. Maybe.
But after thirty-five is acceptable I guess. Hope the divorce goes well.
You mean your dad’s credit limit right?
And no, it isn’t the same thing either.
There’s no such thing as a walk of shame for a guy who just got laid. It’s just a walk.
Soccer is for Geeds.
Yeah, what’s wrong with being a teacher?
“…where did they go wrong with him…”
Maybe he realized growing up that being wealthy is not the only measure of success in life and he doesn’t want to equate self-worth with dollar signs…
Maybe he has a nice trust fund that doesn’t need to be replinished through his own labor so he decided to contribute to society…
Maybe he realizes that an undergrad major is somewhat meaningless…
Maybe you should quit being snobby bitches…
Pretty sure that’s just a chick thing…
You unceremoniously left out the newly painted cervix and throat.
And unfortunately for some on this site, you can’t ride your parent’s or grandparent’s coattails into being classy either.
You are dumb. What about MBA candidates?
…and because nasty Liberal Fems hyphenate…
As a guy, I had no prior knowledge of his work before my fiance introduced me to it–and now I see it everywhere. I will never buy her any–ever. It’s mainstream and thus, not special. Fortunately, she recognizes this too, and will never ask for any.
There’s no jealousy in that comment. It’s a statement of fact. They are not that “fratty.” Well dressed–yes. Educated–yes. None of those qualities are exclusive of those who are “fratty.”
They aren’t really that “fratty.”
Happy to see that some asshole didn’t chime in with something about Harry Winston. Way to keep it civil ladies.
I approve.
I am a guy–though I suppose I have been referred to as a “slampiece” by a sorostitute at some point in my life.
I just don’t see the point of a promise ring. As I understand it, the promise is that one day in the future he will fully commit. If so, that is not a true committment. The same can be said for Letters.
They aren’t lame by themselves necessarily–well, a promise ring is kinda–but they are lame when equated to the same level of committment that comes with an engagement ring.
Being that I am engaged, I completely understand the level of committment that comes with it and EVERYTHING prior to that is merely a partial committment.
This isn’t to say that he doesn’t see future potential in the relationship that could lead to a proposal–but if he were so sure, and so truly committed, a proposal is what you would get…not letters…not a promise ring.
No, engagement rings are, in fact, a form of “true commitment.” Everything before that is semi-commitment and SHOULD NOT be confused with true commitment.
Let’s be reasonable, is it not ridiculous to say that letters or a promise ring is at all similar to the commitment that is TRULY made when a man asks a woman to marry him. And if you say it isn’t unreasonable–then how many levels of true commitment can there be?
The site is called TotalFratMove…therefore anything that takes place within the confines of said site is open to me. It is not, however, a two-way street. Know your place woman.
“It shows true commitment.” Like a promise ring. Lame.
I bet you wore your boyfriend’s letter jacket in high school too…lame…on both counts.