Nice try, nice try. Marriage is more or less a subsidy if you look at the benefits given to a married couple. Slippery slope arguments work. When sodomy laws were passed they swore it would not lead to gay marriage. Look where we are now. And you can call it stupid but my statistics regarding infidelity in the gay community are true.
First of all, the statistics about infidelity were in Canada, where the gays could get married. So let’s not pretend that marriage has or will eliminate the infidelity in the community.
Next, as for impotent couples/couples who don’t want kids, if you read my first article, you’d see they address that pretty well. It’s much harder and more arbitrary to enforce those things, since people can change their mind, etc. Whereas with two men it’s quite obvious they won’t reproduce.
Finally, with regards to my polygamy point, the deeper argument here is that using love as a standard for marriage is simply not sufficient. It sounds nice and pretty but marriage is about more than love; it’s an age old institution that has existed in this form for a reason.
You say that you are confident that eventually gay marraige will become a non-issue and every state will accept it. You may be right, but that doesn’t mean that gay marriage is ok or that I should suddenly support it. More importantly, if you look to Europe, which tends to be 15-20 years ahead of America in terms of the next social movement, what you see is a growing backlash from conservative forces. In France, support for gay marriage dropped over 20 points in under two years. Check out the rallies going on in Paris now.
I feel like 20 is the opposite. To me, an ugly girl is totally fucked since girls are more judged by looks than anything else. If you’re an ugly girl the other 29 things basically don’t apply.
I think a natural masculine instinct made me drawn to your sterotypically feminine traits presented here. In other words, I somehow found you kind of hot.
Good to see Pearls stand up against the ugly feminists.
The truth is that these women just don’t want to admit that a woman’s value quickly depreciates with age, where a man’s does not.
Nice try, nice try. Marriage is more or less a subsidy if you look at the benefits given to a married couple. Slippery slope arguments work. When sodomy laws were passed they swore it would not lead to gay marriage. Look where we are now. And you can call it stupid but my statistics regarding infidelity in the gay community are true.
Appreciate the response hotpiece. A few points…
First of all, the statistics about infidelity were in Canada, where the gays could get married. So let’s not pretend that marriage has or will eliminate the infidelity in the community.
Next, as for impotent couples/couples who don’t want kids, if you read my first article, you’d see they address that pretty well. It’s much harder and more arbitrary to enforce those things, since people can change their mind, etc. Whereas with two men it’s quite obvious they won’t reproduce.
Finally, with regards to my polygamy point, the deeper argument here is that using love as a standard for marriage is simply not sufficient. It sounds nice and pretty but marriage is about more than love; it’s an age old institution that has existed in this form for a reason.
You say that you are confident that eventually gay marraige will become a non-issue and every state will accept it. You may be right, but that doesn’t mean that gay marriage is ok or that I should suddenly support it. More importantly, if you look to Europe, which tends to be 15-20 years ahead of America in terms of the next social movement, what you see is a growing backlash from conservative forces. In France, support for gay marriage dropped over 20 points in under two years. Check out the rallies going on in Paris now.
Douglas, I agree. Nice point.
Yeah man I really want to marry that 12 year old girl. Hey, we’re in love! Who the hell are you to tell me otherwise, you bigot?
See, this is why you should leave the politics to the men.
Gay marriage should not be subsidized by the government because it does not lead to the propagation of society through children: http://tech.mit.edu/V124/N5/kolasinski.5c.html
Gay marriage is a slippery slope. You cannot defend gay marriage and simultaneously oppose polygamy, for example. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/same-sex-marriage-polygamy/
Only 25% of gay men remain monogamous and/or do not cheat on their partner. http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02
I still want to see your tits, though, hotpiece.
This is pretty weird. I’d still date you though, hotpiece
Not stoking up for Nemo because you don’t live in the North.
Hotpiece honestly just let me put my penis in you
I feel like 20 is the opposite. To me, an ugly girl is totally fucked since girls are more judged by looks than anything else. If you’re an ugly girl the other 29 things basically don’t apply.
Many girls on my newsfeed still seem like this
Hey kaotic i’m a gentleman and not a douchebag at all. Wanna have sex now? If not it’s cool you can just suck my #genttip
hiv is for nogs
Gotta love when girls do the selfies when they’re tanning and they take a pic where it looks like it’s from their POV.
Be more subtle, goddamn…….on second thought, don’t.
Not necessarily.
She didn’t do it FOR cancer. She could have justified it by saying it is helping a cancer patient but she clearly is just fucking crazy.
Hate 18, coming home to a house party where some community college geed in a flatbill and nikes charges me five bucks at the door. Fuck that
You mean your penis, right? You’re implying that you have a large dick? That’s clever.
I think a natural masculine instinct made me drawn to your sterotypically feminine traits presented here. In other words, I somehow found you kind of hot.
This is terrifying. My balls hurt. WHAT THE FUCK
That’s so original! Did you come up with that by yourself? It’s a good one cause women are traditionally the ones who cook for their men.