Wow. You’re doing it wrong. Everything you complained about is just a result of you being unprepared or just… not smart.
As for the sexist bit, my last girlfriend introduced me to anal. my roommates last partner introduced him to anal. All of the guys I can think of immediately were asked by their girl to try butt stuff, not the other way around .
ugh this is so accurate. i love gossiping and my friends agree, the difference between being a normal bitchy girl that gossips and an ACTUAL horrible person is if you allow that gossip to influence you to treat others badly and ruin friendships
I’m sorry but there is a difference. if you’re transgender you IDENTIFY with something different than the biological gender you were born with. a boy is a boy because he’s born with a penis not because he thinks he’s a boy. it’s totally fine to identify with a different gender but it’s not the same thing as your biological gender.
That is fair. And I think Harvard is totally fair to prevent use of its name. But I believe sanctioning the groups – likely to the point of dissolution – sets a dangerous precedent. What, in the future, could constitute an “objectionable” group with which to affiliate oneself? The article says that the single-gender organizations do not reflect “21st century values” – how does Harvard define such a vague set of values? Harvard recognizes, one on end of the spectrum, a BDSM sex group student club. On the other end of the spectrum, it recognizes a pro-life group that supports no abortions, no exceptions, in addition to many groups that are anti-gay marriage. There is a Republicans Club and a Democrats Club. I am not condemning or condoning any of those groups, but based on the views held by those groups, Harvard clearly does not endorse the views of any of the groups it “recognizes” – yet it does not recognize “single-gender organizations” because Harvard finds those objectionable. Based on these sanctions, and with the current political climate at Harvard, who is to say that in 10 or 15 years, Harvard will sanction students who are pro-life or women who want to be mothers and not have careers or Catholic students? Harvard would very openly say that it doesn’t consider any of those groups to reflect “21st century values.” On an unrelated but relevant note, since Harvard is full of former high school presidents and valedictorians and students who ran every club in high school, and there are so, so many student groups, and extracurriculars are so important at Harvard, virtually every student has a leadership position in some recognized group or another. Just thoughts, thanks for yours.
The website being named “Crimson theta,” for example doesn’t mean that the chapters don’t heavily associate themselves with Harvard. Using Theta as an example, the fact that they use the word Crimson is a blatant association with Harvard. And directly from their website: “Theta was the first Panhellenic sorority to be founded at Harvard.” The Greek chapters link themselves to Harvard, have used Harvard facilities in the past, etc. The university is well within their rights to try to dissuade and prevent that.
This is actually the most misleading title
Yes. I love you. This is the shit we need on this website.
Not sure what’s funnier the captions or hairstyles
actual LOL
PS I hope you die and your future husband turns gay and cheats on you with the dude you dumped just for taking your ass virginity
Wow. You’re doing it wrong. Everything you complained about is just a result of you being unprepared or just… not smart.
As for the sexist bit, my last girlfriend introduced me to anal. my roommates last partner introduced him to anal. All of the guys I can think of immediately were asked by their girl to try butt stuff, not the other way around .
I feel for this guy so much! No one deserves that type of person in their life and it just goes to show that male abuse exists.
This is 100% me. I have never related to an article on here so much.
run dude. she’s making the crazies seem sane.
lol sure ok
Preach sister! I should send this to my mother.
My roommate desperately need to see this, all she does is worry about what people will think of her outfit when she gets ready EVERYDAY.
so very true! last summer was pretty awesome but this summer we are cramming 8 girls in a teeny tiny 3 bedroom house steps away from the beach 🙂
This is awesome! I’m don’t listen to a lot Drake, but I love memes. And seeing TSM + memes is golden.
so accurate. dreading this summer already
1) It’s Phi
2) Original insult
3) My boyfriend has no issues peeing if you need justification
ugh this is so accurate. i love gossiping and my friends agree, the difference between being a normal bitchy girl that gossips and an ACTUAL horrible person is if you allow that gossip to influence you to treat others badly and ruin friendships
I’m sorry but there is a difference. if you’re transgender you IDENTIFY with something different than the biological gender you were born with. a boy is a boy because he’s born with a penis not because he thinks he’s a boy. it’s totally fine to identify with a different gender but it’s not the same thing as your biological gender.
That is fair. And I think Harvard is totally fair to prevent use of its name. But I believe sanctioning the groups – likely to the point of dissolution – sets a dangerous precedent. What, in the future, could constitute an “objectionable” group with which to affiliate oneself? The article says that the single-gender organizations do not reflect “21st century values” – how does Harvard define such a vague set of values? Harvard recognizes, one on end of the spectrum, a BDSM sex group student club. On the other end of the spectrum, it recognizes a pro-life group that supports no abortions, no exceptions, in addition to many groups that are anti-gay marriage. There is a Republicans Club and a Democrats Club. I am not condemning or condoning any of those groups, but based on the views held by those groups, Harvard clearly does not endorse the views of any of the groups it “recognizes” – yet it does not recognize “single-gender organizations” because Harvard finds those objectionable. Based on these sanctions, and with the current political climate at Harvard, who is to say that in 10 or 15 years, Harvard will sanction students who are pro-life or women who want to be mothers and not have careers or Catholic students? Harvard would very openly say that it doesn’t consider any of those groups to reflect “21st century values.” On an unrelated but relevant note, since Harvard is full of former high school presidents and valedictorians and students who ran every club in high school, and there are so, so many student groups, and extracurriculars are so important at Harvard, virtually every student has a leadership position in some recognized group or another. Just thoughts, thanks for yours.
The website being named “Crimson theta,” for example doesn’t mean that the chapters don’t heavily associate themselves with Harvard. Using Theta as an example, the fact that they use the word Crimson is a blatant association with Harvard. And directly from their website: “Theta was the first Panhellenic sorority to be founded at Harvard.” The Greek chapters link themselves to Harvard, have used Harvard facilities in the past, etc. The university is well within their rights to try to dissuade and prevent that.